ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1984-00192 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 24 Apr 84, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his general (under honorable conditions) discharge to honorable. For an accounting of the facts surrounding his previous request and the rationale of the Board’s earlier decision, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E. By DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record Under the Provisions of Title 10 U.S. Code, Section 1552, dated 4 Jul 86, the applicant requested his general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded and his RE code be changed. On 22 Aug 86, the applicant was advised that his request did not meet the criterion for reconsideration by the Board. By DD Form 149, dated 15 Apr 14, the applicant submitted another request for reconsideration. In this request, the applicant states that on 16 May 77, pursuant to his request for executive clemency, his civil court conviction (9 May 77) for distribution of marijuana was dismissed with prejudice and he was ordered to pay a $500 fine. On this same date, the Governor’s Pardon and Parole committee, and the Secretary of the Corrections Department, granted him a full pardon and restoration of rights by the state of New Mexico, the issuance of a concealed handgun license, and Global Entry Status was granted by the Ombudsman Office of the Department of Homeland Security. In support of his request for clemency, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of his DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, Certificate of Pardon and Restoration of Citizenship certificate, court order, memorandums, and various other documents in support of his request. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments is at Exhibit F. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. In an earlier finding, the Board determined that there was insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action regarding the applicant’s request for upgrade of his general (under honorable conditions) discharge to honorable. After careful reconsideration of his request and thoroughly reviewing his most recent submission, we do not find it sufficiently persuasive to warrant a revision of the Board’s earlier determination in this case. In the interest of justice we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented, to include the governor’s pardon or that he was issued a concealed handgun license sufficient to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Accordingly, we find no basis to act favorable on his request for upgrade of his general (under honorable conditions) discharge. 2. The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-1984-00192 in Executive Session on 12 Mar 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 21 Oct 70, w/atch. Exhibit F. DD Form 149, dated 15 Apr 14, w/atchs.